Diversity of provision of public services symposium: current research and its implications

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Friday, 13th April 2012

Symposium programme

Pauline Allen  convened the symposium  to discuss recent developments in the delivery of public services. Using the government’s recent White Paper ‘Open Public Services’ (2011) as a starting point ,  the  increasingly diverse range of providers of public services was discussed.  In fact, this policy is not new – the previous New Labour government had been encouraging the entry of different providers to various public services. The symposium  provided an opportunity to explore and compare rationales, processes and results of increasing diversity of provision within different areas of the public sector and to assess the implications for the performance of public services.

One of the contributions was from Imelda McDermott, dealing with the increasing diversity of providers of primary health care services.

Health Policy & Politics Network (HPPN) 2012 Spring Event

The Health Policy & Politics Network (HPPN) is successor to the Politics of Health Group that has been run for the last 20 years or so in the form of a special interest group of the Political Studies Association. HPPN has now become independent in order more easily to encourage interdisciplinary working. HPPN aims to provide a forum for the reporting of research and analytical discussion about any aspect of the politics of health, health care policy or health services management and to facilitate the development of informal and collaborative relationships between academics and interested practitioners working in the above fields.

EVENT DETAILS >>

Department of Health Policy Research Units

On Tuesday 31st January, PRUComm Director Stephen Peckham and Deputy Director Kath Checkland attended a meeting for all the heads of the new Department of Health Policy Research Units. PRUComm is one of 11 such units, funded until December 2015. This was an opportunity for the researchers involved to get together to discuss their experiences over the first year of the programme, hosted by the Department of Health. The meeting was well attended, and there were useful presentations from senior policy staff from the Department of Health, as well as an introduction from the Chief Medical Officer, Professor Dame Sally Davis. In the afternoon, representatives from some of the units provided some insights based upon some of their experiences so far. Overall this was an invaluable opportunity to share notes with other researchers and to make more informal contacts with our Department of Health ‘customers’.

PRUComm research seminar on healthcare commissioning

On Tuesday 17th January, PRUComm hosted a Commissioning Seminar, bringing together academics with policy makers from the Department of Health in order to discuss research evidence relevant to Commissioning. In addition to the formal presentations which brought together early evidence from a number of ongoing projects, the seminar provided an excellent opportunity for policy makers and researchers to discuss their concerns, needs and issues in an informal environment. PRUComm is committed to ensuring that their research is relevant to the concerns of policy makers, whilst adhering to the highest academic standards, and this seminar was one of a series that will be organised over the coming years to provide a forum within which ideas can be shared in a supportive environment.

Researching policy as it unfolds

BY DR KATH CHeCkland 

One of the first projects that we are doing here at PRUComm is an exploration of the early working and experiences of emerging Clinical Commissioning Groups. This project will deliver a final report in June 2012, and the aim is to provide early learning to inform the ongoing development of CCGs for the DH, policy makers, the new NHS Commissioning Board and GPs and managers in the field.

Researching policy is never easy, as interventions are rarely clearly defined and outcomes are often difficult to both define and assess. In this case these difficulties have been compounded by the fact that the policy is developing and changing as we go along. The ‘pause’ in the legislation, and ongoing amendments to the Health and Social Care Bill in the House of Lords, mean that, even more than usual, we are researching a moving target. However, we do not feel that this means that we should not try. Now, more than ever, we need to use our research expertise to help those who have the difficult task of making the policy a reality on the ground. Exploring the unfolding picture, as it happens and in real time, is challenging and difficult, but it is rewarding, and has the potential to contribute significantly to the policy process. As always, we are immensely grateful to our participants, who are generous in providing access to their organisations, talking to researchers and filling in questionnaires. As for our findings… watch this space!

Dr Kath Checkland is Deputy Director of PRUComm

Sympathising with commissioners

By Stephen Peckham

Commissioning is a complex and difficult process. It is fundamentally about relationships and with the organisation and structure of the NHS currently in flux the job of commissioners are constantly being faced with new challenges.

Right now, there is plenty that is new, changing and uncertain, both from the policy perspective and in practical terms. Most of those concerned are just finding their way. Many of the issues which pre-occupy commissioners are similar, regardless of whether PCTs, Clinical Commissioning Groups or any other group are in charge. They are often about getting right the information for decision-making and about feeling constrained by national and public priorities.

At PRUComm our job is to understand how commissioning processes work and how people are managing the complex challenges and relationships, so we can share the learning with colleagues. We’re not here to tell commissioners how they should be operating but by working with commissioners and policy makers we hope to support policy and practice.

We are pulling together some of the learning from previous research – in the UK and other countries – on commissioning. We will be examining areas such as  the impact of patient involvement and clinical leadership in the process. A focus of our energy will be the workings of the many different relationships – for example between NHS commissioners and local authorities as well as between local and national healthcare commissioners. Knowledge and analysis will be fed back to the Department of Health, which funds the unit, and across the NHS and among the local agencies with whom we work.

This is a relatively new field of research both here and internationally. It represents a great opportunity for us to bring learning from Britain to other similar health economies. We will have done our job well, if we can really help all the players in this vast process to get the best out of commissioning – for their organisations, but most of all for the key focus of commissioning – patients and the general public.

Those with responsibility in this field are trying to spend the money in the right way, but it is a dynamic, complicated and difficult process. Hopefully, we can offer them tools and some thinking that will make their tasks easier.

Stephen Peckham is Director of PRUComm