Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs Timolol Trial

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”||0px|||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.16″ custom_padding=”12px||0px|||” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.16″ global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.16″ text_font=”||||||||” header_font=”Roboto||||||||” header_text_color=”#323232″ header_font_size=”40px” header_line_height=”1.2em” max_width=”85%” module_alignment=”center” custom_margin=”||19px|||” global_colors_info=”{}”]

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) vs Timolol Trial

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#003389″ divider_weight=”3px” _builder_version=”4.16″ width=”100%” max_width=”21%” module_alignment=”left” custom_margin=”|||0px|false|false” custom_padding=”|||80px|false|false” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_divider][et_pb_image src=”https://iceh.lshtm.ac.uk/files/2021/03/20170124-150222_edit-scaled.jpg” title_text=”Research Mentoring Network Meeting” _builder_version=”4.16″ max_width=”85%” module_alignment=”center” global_colors_info=”{}”][/et_pb_image][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.18.0″ text_font=”|600|||||||” text_text_color=”#323232″ header_font=”Roboto||||||||” header_text_color=”#323232″ max_width=”85%” module_alignment=”center” min_height=”88px” custom_margin=”-4px||-6px|||” custom_padding=”0px||0px|||” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]

Background

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) including Tanzania. Moreover, SSA also has the highest prevalence of Open Angle Glaucoma (OAG) of any region, estimated at 4.8% of people over 40 years.

There is a reasonable body of evidence indicating that using SLT to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) could provide long-term control, replacing eye drops without surgical risks.

The aim of this study was to  determine whether Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT) is superior to timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma.

Outcomes 

The obejctive was to determine baseline characteristics of Tanzanian patients with glaucoma, compare success rate, acceptance, complications and cost of the two interventions after one to five years, and to collect further related factors among glaucoma patients.

The trial was a randomized, controlled, parallel group, single-masked trial with two treatment arms.

Primary outcome measure was IOP, primary outcome was the success rate after one to five years defined as IOP below target pressure. Secondary outcomes and outcome measures included mean IOP at different time points, adherence, change of visual acuity and visual field, complications, vision related quality of life, patient reported outcomes and experiences, qualitative and cost analyses of the two treatment options.

We found that SLT successfully reduced eye pressure to normal levels (up to 18 or 21mmHg) in significantly more patients after one year (61% of eyes) compared to the standard treatment of timolol eye drops (31% of eyes).

The study also considered the affordability of SLT, finding that in spite of the initial cost of the laser equipment, for hospitals dealing with high volumes of glaucoma patients the treatment could be offered at a similar price as the annual supply of eye drops.

Read a news piece about the outcomes of this trial here

Publication

Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus 0·5% timolol eye drops for the treatment of glaucoma in Tanzania: a randomised controlled trial. Philippin H, Matayan E, Knoll K, et al. The Lancet Global Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00348-X

Acknowledgements 

We thank the trial participants for their trust and commitment. The trial was funded by the Seeing is Believing Innovation Fund, a collaboration between Standard Chartered Bank and International Agency for Prevention of Blindness, and CBM (Christian Blind Mission). We thank the members of the patient steering group as well as the data and safety monitoring board for their services and valuable input. In addition, we thank the administrative support of the Eye Department of the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, and Christian Blind Mission. We acknowledge the regional eye care coordinator, the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College and National Institute for Medical Research Dar es Salaam for their support.

Contact

If you would like more information on this project, please contact Heiko.Philippin@lshtm.ac.uk

 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]